Skip to content

[action] [PR:16169] Correcting client arguments to dynamically_compensate_leakout in PGSharedWatermarkTest#407

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/16169
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:16169] Correcting client arguments to dynamically_compensate_leakout in PGSharedWatermarkTest#407
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intoAzure:202503from
mssonicbld:cherry/msft-202503/16169

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#8149 the multi-asic and multi-dut variants were added to test_qos_sai.py.
This required updating calls to dynamically_compensate_leakout to specify either the src_client or dst_clientbut a couple calls inPGSharedWatermarkTest` passed the wrong client.

For more details on the failure this causes see sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16167

Summary:
Fixes #16167

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

…GSharedWatermarkTest`

In sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#8149 the `multi-asic` and `multi-dut` variants were added to `test_qos_sai.py`.
This required updating calls to `dynamically_compensate_leakout` to specify either the `src_client` or dst_client` but a couple calls in `PGSharedWatermarkTest` passed the wrong client.

For more details on the failure this causes see sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16167

Summary:
Fixes #16167

### Type of change

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] Test case(new/improvement)

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [x] 202405
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16169

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines could not run because the pipeline triggers exclude this branch/path.

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit bf542c7 into Azure:202503 Jun 16, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant